Tuesday, October 15

Sean 'Diddy' Combs receives six new lawsuits for sexual abuse and assault

Pilar del Castillo Avatar

By Castle Pillar

15 Oct 2024, 10:23 AM EDT

The twists and turns in the case of the music businessman Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs they don’t stop, and it was recently revealed that six new lawsuits for sexual abuse and assault have come to light, bringing the total to 18.

According to the first reports, the complaints filed against the rapper were filed anonymously before the federal court of the Southern District of New York.

Although the identity of the victims remains anonymous, the accusations were listed through a team of lawyers made up of Andrew Van Arsdale, of AVA Law Group; Antigone Curis, by Curis Law; and Tony Buzbee of the Buzbee Law Firm.

Sean “Diddy” Combs accuses government of leaking Cassie Ventura video

The latter indicated that Sean “Diddy” Combs was denounced by violence, sexual assault, abuse, facilitated sex with a controlled substance, forced prostitution, and dissemination of video recordings. Besides, It emerged that one of the plaintiffs would have been 16 years old at the time of the alleged assault.

According to official documents to which Page Six had access, one of the complainants claims that Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs sexually abused her in 2004, when she was just 19 years old. At that time, the young woman would have been invited to a photo session of the singer and, later, to his room at the Marriott hotel in Manhattan.

Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs will appear before the judge for the crime of sex trafficking

Within her statement, the woman stated that she was taken to a “separate room,” where the door was closed. There, the music mogul attacked her and a friend and “threatened to kill them both” if they did not comply with his “orders.”

So far it is known thatThe trial against Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs for the crime of sex trafficking will begin on May 5, 2025 in New York and is expected to last for a month. However, the Federal Prosecutor’s Office warned that this could be prolonged, due to the wave of charges that could be filed against the artist.