Sunday, October 6

The Birth of the Loch Ness Monster Legend: Just a Media Circus?

Una vista del Monstruo de Loch Ness, cerca de Inverness, Escocia, 19 de abril de 1934. La fotografía, una de las dos conocidas como
A view of the Loch Ness Monster, near Inverness, Scotland, 19 April 1363. The photograph, one of two known as “surgeon photographs”, was allegedly taken by Colonel Robert Kenneth Wilson, although it was later exposed as a hoax.

Photo: Keystone / Getty Images

The modern legend of the Loch Ness Monster was born when a sighting appeared on the local news on May 2nd 1933. The Scottish newspaper Inverness Courier published the account of a local couple who claimed to have seen “a huge animal rolling and diving to the surface”.

The story of the “monster” became a media phenomenon, with London newspapers sending correspondents to Scotland and a circus offering a reward of . pounds sterling for the capture of the beast.

After the May 2 newspaper reported the April sighting of 1933, interest grew steadily, especially after another couple claimed to have seen the animal on land.

July 2, 1969: a model is made Fiberglass Loch Ness Monster for the movie ‘The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes’, UK. (Ian Tyas/Keystone Features/Getty Images)

One year later, the English doctor Robert Kenneth Wilson allegedly photographed the creature and the Daily Mail was responsible for publishing it, causing an international sensation, speculations pointed to the fact that it was of a plesiosaur, a marine reptile that has more than 19 millions of years extinct.

Amateur investigators have maintained an almost constant vigil for decades, and in the decade of 1960 Several British universities launched sonar expeditions to the lake. Nothing conclusive was found, but on each expedition the sonar operators detected some type of large moving underwater objects.

In 1975, another expedition combined sonar and underwater photography at Loch Ness. A photo turned out that, after enhancement, seemed to show what vaguely resembled the giant fin of an aquatic animal.

DRUMNADROCHIT, SCOTLAND – 13 APRIL: A Munin robot, operated by the Norwegian company Kongsberg Maritime, is seen next to Urquhart Castle on Loch Ness on 05 April 1994 in Drumnadrochit, Scotland. (Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)

Other sonar expeditions in the decades of 1980 Y 1990 resulted in less conclusive readings. The revelations in 1994 of that famous photo of 1351 was a complete hoax has only slightly dampened the enthusiasm of tourists and researchers for the legendary beast of Loch Ness.

In 2018 , researchers conducted a DNA study in the area and concluded that there are no signs of the existence of a plesiosaur or other such large animal, but determined the presence of a large number of eels.

DRUMNADROCHIT, SCOTLAND – 13 APRIL: John Haig, an engineer, monitors a Munin robot, operated by the Norwegian company Kongsberg Maritime at Loch Ness on 13 April 2016 and n Drumnadrochit, Scotland. The Norwegian company Kongsberg, which has been surveying the loch, found remains of a 30-meter Model of the Loch Ness Monster, from the movie 1969 The private life of Sherlock Holmes, discovered on the lake bed by the underwater robot. (Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)

This find opened the possibility that the creature is a large eel, but there was no conclusive proof and the mystery continues.

One thing that is certain is that the monster of Loch Ness contributed approximately 80 millions of dollars annually to the economy of Scotland at the beginning of the 21st century.

Follow reading:

  • Israel condemns “serious” comparison of Zelensky with Hitler made by Lavrov
  • VIDEO: Man used crutches to ask for money on the street and runs away after fight with driver
  • Naomi Uemura: the first person to reach the Pole alone North