She speaks like a Mexican because she has lived in that country for more than a decade, but she is not.
She was born in Denmark, grew up in different European countries and did her doctorate at the University of Cambridge , UK. Alice Krozer knows the intersection between Latin America and Europe and has specialized in studies on inequality, elites and social perceptions.
The research carried out together with Raymundo Campos-Vazquez, Aurora, deals with precisely these issues. Ramírez-Álvarez, Rodolfo de la Torre and Roberto-Velez-Grajales. The focus was on the perceptions of Mexicans.
“People want less inequality, but they don’t want to pay more taxes,” says the researcher at the Colegio de México. “It is a kind of paradox between what you would like and what you are willing to sacrifice “.
It is true that in Mexico there is an image negative tax because many people believe that in the end the benefits do not reach the most vulnerable sectors, he points out.
But when asked about a hypothetical scenario in relation to how much would be willing to contribute to end poverty and inequality – not to mention the tax issue – the response was not very generous, especially in the richest sectors of the population.
You did a study of how Mexicans perceive inequality and social mobility in their country. What were the main conclusions of the research?
One of the conclusions is that people do know that there is a lot of inequality in Mexico. That perception is quite close to the measurements. And the same about poverty .
But people have a very different idea about what poverty is. wealth and what is social mobility. In wealth they overestimate how many rich people really exist.
Regarding social mobility, people believe that it is much higher. They think that a 30% of those born poor will become rich. And that is not like that. From 100 people who are born into poverty, only two people manage to reach the highest income sector. It is a huge discrepancy between perception and reality.
The other important conclusion is that people do not associate the tax system with redistribution. People want less inequality, but they don’t want to pay more taxes. They don’t make a connection between the two. They do not think that taxes can be a redistributive measure.
The study indicates that Mexicans would be willing to contribute with a 10% of their income to reduce inequality and poverty. How does it vary according to the social stratum to which the question was asked?
There is a question that says: if I gave you an income of a thousand pesos and told you that with a magic stick I’m going to make poverty and inequality disappear, how much would you be willing to give of those thousand pesos?
In Mexico, the poorest said they would be willing to contribute a 15%, while people with more wealth said that would give 7.5% on average. This means that those with higher incomes are less concerned about the problem.
Why are they less concerned about the problem?
It may be for personal reasons in the sense that they are not aware of the suffering caused by inequality, although it may also have to do with ethical ideals. But that specific question was not part of the study.
When asked about willingness to contribute in this hypothetical scenario, they did not ask how much they were willing to pay in taxes …
No, they were separate questions.
C hen they specifically asked about paying more taxes to reduce inequality and poverty … did they detect that some do not want to pay more taxes because they do not believe that they are efficient, that is, because resources do not really reach the most vulnerable?
People with high incomes used to say, I pay a lot of taxes, I will not pay more. We asked them how much you think you pay in income taxes now.
And everyone, regardless of socioeconomic level, answered 40% . That is much higher than what is paid today in Mexico.
And how much is paid in taxes in Mexico?
It depends, but on average a 22%. But everyone thinks they pay 40%. Then we ask them how much they would like to pay. And everyone answered around 22%, which is what you actually pay. That’s the irony.
Then we ask them what their ideal tax rate would be for rich people, for those with a middle income, and for poor people. Most said their ideal rate for the poor would be like a 14%, for the middle sectors a 22%.
But for the rich, people with less income said they should pay more, while people more The rich said they should pay less.
How much do the richest pay?
Nominally they should pay near a 35%, but in reality they only pay 18%
Why?
There are several factors including evasion, avoidance, exemptions …
How do you define a rich person in Mexico?
There is no rich category as such. Commonly in economic studies, for example, the 1% measurement is used. In Mexico, the 1% with the highest income earn close to 150. 000 monthly pesos.
And at the other extreme?
In Mexico about half of the population lives in poverty. And if we add to that the population with vulnerabilities, we arrive at a 80%. That is, there is very little margin to have an average income.
And at that level of poverty, the effect of the pandemic is not yet included.
In general, can we say that Mexicans would like to have less inequality, but they are not Willing to pay more taxes?
Yes. What the study shows is that people don’t make the connection between inequality and paying taxes. In Mexico there is a very negative image of taxes.
But that will have some real support, given the levels of corruption that have historically existed in the country …
That bad image is not accidental. For many decades, paying taxes has been very frowned upon. That has to do with ideological issues and with practical issues.
People wonder how much paying taxes helps the poorest, or how much taxes help if there is no good free public health or educational system.
In the study you say that paying taxes is the best tool to reduce inequality. But if people are suspicious and do not see the social benefits of paying taxes, perhaps that negative idea is justified. What is your opinion?
Surely a A significant part of taxes goes to places where it shouldn’t go, be it inefficiency, corruption, or whatever. But I think that this is not why you have to have a negative idea of taxes.
There is also the view that the State should not intervene in redistribution issues. There is a conservative vision of having a small State.
In Scandinavian countries, for example, you pay three or four times more than you pay in taxes here. They also complain about taxes, but on a very different level. They say I don’t want to pay 48% of my income, I prefer to pay 40% or 45%.
But in Mexico and Latin America in general they are not so clear the benefits of the tax system …
It is that among the richest people, there are many who do not agree that health and education should be for everyone. Beyond not seeing the benefits, there is an idea about the role of the State.
You measured inequality using the Gini Index and discovered that Mexicans show I would like to have an inequality like Finland’s…
We show them scenarios about inequality and we ask them what the ideal situation would be. Mexico has a Gini of 0.5. They answered that a Gini of 0.3 or 0 would be ideal, 20, and Finland . Obviously we did not ask them about the Gini, but we showed them some graphs so that they could choose the ideal system.
About half of the respondents said they would like to have an inequality equivalent to Finland, ie 0.2. That tells us that people do not want to live in such an unequal country. People do want a more equal society. And the Scandinavian countries are usually like a utopia.
Obviously things do not work perfectly in those countries. I have grown up in Denmark and I know that things are not ideal there either. Although what Mexicans want, what they aspire to, is to have a fairer society, with greater opportunities.
But without paying more taxes …
It is that Mexicans dream of being like Finland, but without paying taxes like Finns.
The idea of wanting to be like a Scandinavian country, insofar as To have less inequality, it ends there.
Being a Scandinavian country implies paying close to half of your income in taxes in the highest tranches high s.
The minimum income tax rate, for example in Denmark, starts at a 36%. And that is equivalent to the maximum rate in Mexico.
After this research, what feeling did you is it beyond academic?
I had many more questions. So we got more funding and now we are about to go out on the field to continue investigating these issues.
And I was wondering how you can convince people that it is a good idea to pay more taxes, or at least have a more progressive tax system to reduce inequality.
It is urgent to do something about this issue. With the pandemic, more income is needed now more than ever. And since Mexico is one of the countries with the greatest inequality in the world and with the least social mobility, it is important to do something.
Are you interested in:
Now you can receive notifications from BBC Mundo. Download the new version of our app and activate them so as not to miss our best content.
Do you already know our YouTube channel? Subscribe!