Friday, September 20

Azalia Ojeda, former 'Big Brother', breaks the silence after being arrested: “I was unjustly accused”


After being arrested for trying to cash a check with a theft report, the former participant of Big Brobther in Mexico, gave her version in which she claimed she was unjustly accused

Azalia Ojeda, ex ‘Big Brother’, rompe el silencio tras ser detenida: “Fui acusada injustamente”
It is not the first time that “The Negra “has problems with the law | Credit: Reform Agency

Photo: Archive / Reform Agency

Rocío García

Azalia Ojeda , known as “La Negra” and ex ‘ Big Brother , was arrested last Thursday afternoon 20 May in the State of Mexico while trying to cash a check for 350 thousand Mexican pesos , which had been reported as Stolen.

Although at first they assured that this was the main reason why it was presented to the Public Ministry Agency, it was later confirmed that was detained for less than 48 hours accused only of bribery , that is, for trying to bribe the authorities who detained her saw.

After a series of investigations, the Prosecutor’s Office determined that “La Negra” had to be released by lack of evidence , since those who had reported the theft of checks failed to prove that she was the one who stole them of the address where they were.

After scandal and quieter, the former participant of the first generation of the reality show ‘Big Brobther’ in Mexico, gave his version in the that he assured was unjustly accused.

“Everyone is free to express their opinion and create a story far from reality … now, with real evidence and in the closest way, I will give my version, making it clear that I have no responsibility for everything that I was unjustly accused. So I am not nor was I guilty that I am calm and free “, reads a message shared by the program Gossip No Like on your Instagram profile.

However, according to what was said by the lawyer of the affected party, Ojeda stated that the check for which she was accused was given to her by someone known as payment for a property that she sold. But there are other irregularities in the case that could target influence peddling .

The simple fact of carrying that check that was already an element of crime, was to link . The Prosecutor’s Office could not do it or did not want to do it . The Prosecutor’s Office states that she took that money as a collection from an apartment that she sold to a friend, that that friend sent her that check. This check is endorsed by herself in your name and apparently the signature is also forged of the head of the company that I represent ”, explained the lawyer Berenice Romero for the program ‘Sale el Sol’.