“It is declared that the decision of the Legislative Assembly (…) is unconstitutional, inasmuch as it violates the republican, democratic and representative form of government.”
Thus the Chamber of the Constitutional Court of the Supreme Court of Justice (CSJ) of El Salvador, whose magistrates were dismissed this Saturday after a vote in Congress that now controls by majority the New Ideas party of the country’s president, Nayib Bukele.
The controversial vote provoked a torrent of national and international condemnations of the highest level by those who consider that the decision violates the independence of powers of the State bodies and lacks legal support.
Among Other criticisms highlighted that of the United States government, El Salvador’s main trading partner, which has already contacted President Bukele to express its “serious concerns” about what happened.
“We are cleaning our house… and that is not his in cumbencia ”, the Salvadoran president responded firmly to the statements of the international community.
Bukele had public confrontations with the judges of the Supreme Court after they resolved appeals against some steps he tried to take during the pandemic. In April of last year, for example, he announced that he would not comply with a sentence regarding forced confinement for those who did not comply with quarantine.
But this Saturday, the Salvadoran president defended the vote of the deputies pointing to article 186 of the Salvadoran Constitution, which provides that the Legislative Assembly can remove the magistrates “for specific causes, previously established by law” if the initiative has the support of two thirds of the deputies.
- The new Legislative Assembly of El Salvador, akin to Bukele, dismisses the Constitutional judges and the attorney general
- What does it mean for El Salvador that Bukele reaches “absolute power” with control of the Legislative Assembly
The congressmen who supported the dismissal tion, which was approved by an absolute majority (64 from 84 voted in favor, including all the deputies of Bukele’s party and other allied formations), they assured that the magistrates “acted against the Constitution, putting particular interests first over the health and life of the entire population.”
In the same way, they gave the green light to dismiss the attorney general, Raúl Melara, who they said has “ties” with the opposition Arena party that would question his independence, they assured.
Bukele also had several clashes with Melara as a result of his decisions at the head of the Prosecutor’s Office, many of them public between them through Twitter.
Not @ nayibbukele , pa For me, all citizens are equal.
You seem the expert in pointing out others and covering yours, even if they trample the Law.
You don’t have to be so obvious.
But let me explain… https://t.co/i4UugASiil
– Raúl Melara (@MelaraRaul) October 2, 2020
What did the Constitutional Chamber and the attorney general say about their dismissals?
After the vote in the Assembly, the Constitutional Chamber issued a resolution to declare the dismissal of its magistrates “unconstitutional, because it violates judicial independence.”
The body argued that “with a marked intention of suppressing effective controls towards the Executive and Legislative body”, the decision of the deputies “negatively affects the control of the exercise of power” q which is carried out by the Constitutional Chamber.
The Chamber assured that the dismissal “is not preceded by the procedural guarantees necessary to ensure it”, and even if it had had a prior process, “it affects the dimension external of said formal principle, which requires the absence of pressure from the other organs of the State. ”
“The lack of approval of the Executive body is not a reason to dismiss constitutional judges, at the same time that it constitutes a future dissuasive factor for any other conformation of this room, that is, a coercion ”, the text reads.
Despite this resolution, the deputies elected the same Saturday night or to five substitute magistrates and the new prosecutor, who, guarded by police agents, entered the CSJ facilities and the Public Ministry building, respectively.
dismissed when they issued that resolution (which also has neither signatures, nor stamps, nor official communication)… ”Bukele tweeted to downplay the position of the Constitutional Chamber.
Hours later, Aldo Cader Camilot and Marina Marenco de Torrento – two of the dismissed CSJ magistrates – published their resignation letters in which they assured that they have never been linked or have responded to interests of no political party or any economic power.
On Sunday afternoon, the social networks of the Constitutional Chamber and the CSJ already showed their first changes by eliminating the resolution of the dismissed magistrates and publishing a first photo of the five new titles ares.
New magistrates of the Constitutional Chamber. pic.twitter.com/bh87 kXKHsK
– Constitutional Chamber (@SalaCnalSV) May 2, 2021
On Sunday night, the dismissed Raúl Melara said that his expulsion was “Unconstitutional” and “lacks legal validity”, but he also announced his irrevocable resignation from the position of attorney general for “the welfare of his family” and for not being able to have “the necessary guarantees” to exercise.
“I have had a long legal career that shows my honesty and ability,” he said in a statement to reject the allegations against him.
In addition, he assured that during his work as a prosecutor he demonstrated the “Objectivity and probity required by said position”, who carried out his duties “as a representative of the interests of the State and of the to society, always attached to the Law ”and that during his tenure people were processed“ regardless of interest. ”
What did the United States say?
This Sunday, US Vice President Kamala Harris showed his “deep concerns about the democracy of El Salvador.”
“An independent judiciary is essential for a healthy democracy and a strong economy”, wrote on Twitter.
Hours earlier, US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken said he had contacted Bukele to express his government’s “great concern” over what happened after the decision to “undermine the highest court in El Salvador and the attorney general Melara.”
In addition, it defended that Melara was “fighting corruption and impunity” and was “an effective partner” to combat crime “both in the United States and in El Salvador,” according to a statement released by his department.
“This is not done,” said in networks about what happened Juan González, Biden’s advisor for Latin America as director for the Western Hemisphere of the US National Security Council.
“The existence of a strong relationship between the United States and El Salvador will depend on the government of El Salvador supports the separation of powers and upholding democratic norms, ”said Julie Chung, acting undersecretary of the Office of Western Hemisphere Affairs of the US Department of State.
The Salvadoran president maintained a very cordial relationship with the previous US government led by Donald Trump, but has shown clear discrepancies with the current Executive des that Biden came to power. The Salvadoran did not receive, for example, the special envoy for the Northern Triangle of the White House, Ricardo Zúñiga, during his visit to Central America last month.
Some congressmen Americans also joined in the criticism. Democrat Albio Sires opined that “if the dismissal of the magistrates is not reconsidered”, “the US government should decrease cooperation” with El Salvador.
What other international reactions were there?
The Organization of American States (OAS) rejected the dismissals, recalling that “in democracy, majorities have the responsibility of being fundamental guarantors to ensure respect to human rights and fundamental freedoms; access to power and its exercise subject to the rule of law; the plural regime of political parties and organizations; and the separation and independence of public powers. ”
“ When the majorities impose a single and standardized vision for the rest of the political system, they are undermining these principles. When the majorities eliminate the systems of checks and balances in the institutional framework, they are altering the essence of its functioning, “he added in a statement.
The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) also criticized the dismissals “without due process or specific constitutional causes, which puts the rule of law at risk” in El Salvador.
In addition, it urged the Salvadoran government to respect the ruling of the Constitutional Chamber that declared the Assembly vote unconstitutional.