It is not the opinion of his lawyer which is based on a detailed medical opinion: “the assumption of responsibility in his country of origin is not possible” . And to recall that “the rate of fine particles suspended in the air, measured in Bangladesh, is among the highest in the world”. As for the mortality rate linked to asthma, a pathology that Sheel presents, it is “, 82 for 100. inhabitants, against 0, 82 in France “. The 15 June 2019, the Toulouse administrative court canceled the obligation to leave the territory, but without brandishing the criterion of atmospheric pollution as a criterion of danger. On the other hand, the 12 last December, the administrative court of appeal of Bordeaux, seized by the Prefect of Haute-Garonne, was much more categorical. For the court, sending Sheel back to his country of origin would lead to “an aggravation of his respiratory pathology due to air pollution”. Without taking into account that he “would be confronted with the risks of interruption of a treatment less well adapted to his state of health and to dysfunctions of the respiratory system of which he has a vital need, because, on the one hand difficulties in replacing parts, and on the other hand, power cuts during the night ” In other words, justice brought in the climatic criterion to assess the state of health risk in which a sick foreigner finds himself and that is a first … 
And for good reason: he suffers from an asthma allergic to dust mites and a syndrome of severe sleep apnea which requires daily assistance from a breathing apparatus to sleep. Electrical equipment that must undergo rigorous maintenance, with monthly replacement of the mask, filters and hoses. Not to mention, the heavy drug treatment he must follow in parallel to the letter. “Worsening of his pathology” in the event of return from Bangladesh
The first name has been changed